Blaise Pascal (d. 1662) was a French mathematician, scientist and inventor. As a mathematician, he wrote on the subject of projective geometry, probability theory, and differential calculus. As a scientist, he made significant contributions to the study of fluids, the explanation of the concepts of atmospheric pressure and of vacuum. He was a pioneering inventor of the mechanical calculator, barometer, and syringe.<\/p>\n
However, Pascal strongly opposed scientism, or the fallacy of believing that the method of science must be employed on all<\/em> forms of human experience. Scientism also believes that natural sciences, given time, will solve just every issue faced by humanity.<\/p>\n Pascal\u2019s thought indicated that in order to save humanity from scientism, there must be a proper appreciation of two basic types of mind: the geometrical mind (esprit g\u00e9om\u00e9trique<\/em>) and the intuitive mind (esprit de finesse<\/em>). While in essence the human mind remains one, a balance must be struck between these two contrasting directions that the mind can take.<\/p>\n It must be noted that in Islamic tradition, as represented for instance by Ibn al-\u2018Arabi (d. 1240), al-Sha\u2018rani (d. 1565) and al-Zabidi (d. 1791), there are three levels of knowledge, which are technically termed as knowledge of the intellect (\u2018ilm al-\u2018aql<\/em>), knowledge of the states (\u2018ilm al-ahwal<\/em>), and knowledge of the secrets (\u2018ilm al-asrar<\/em>).<\/p>\n The first level of knowledge, the knowledge of the intellect, is whatever knowledge a person obtains either \u2018necessarily\u2019 or \u2018in origination from his thinking\u2019.<\/p>\n Knowledge obtained \u2018necessarily\u2019 refers to the most basic, intrinsic logical grounds of all reasoning, in which thing is known immediately \u2018of necessity\u2019 (daruratan<\/em>), such as the principle of non-contradiction. It also further refers to the thing that is known self-evidently (badihatan<\/em>), in such a way that it cannot possibly be refuted or rejected, such as that \u201cone is the half of two\u201d.<\/p>\n In the second case of thinking-originated knowledge, thing is known as a result of the person\u2019s mental inquiry (nazar<\/em>) concerning an evidence or proof (dalil<\/em>)\u2014provided that he discovers the probative aspect (\u2018uthur<\/em>) of that evidence. The emphasis in this level is on the discursive mental processes of conceptual thinking (al-fikr<\/em>) and mental inquiry, which can lead to all sorts of error. That is the reason why philosophers say about rational speculation that some of the arguments is sound (sahih<\/em>) and some is invalid (fasid<\/em>).<\/p>\n The second level of knowledge is called \u2018ilm al-ahwal<\/em>, which refers to the knowledge of the \u2018state\u2019, \u2018condition\u2019 or \u2018case\u2019 of a thing. Examples of this sort of knowledge are knowledge of the sweetness of honey, the bitterness of aloes, the pleasure of sexual intercourse, of excessive love (\u2018ishq<\/em>), spiritual inner agitation (wajd<\/em>), and passionate longing (shawq<\/em>).<\/p>\n Such objects are known\u2014and their knower is characterized as knowing them\u2014only by \u2018savouring\u2019 or \u2018tasting\u2019 (dhawq<\/em>), which is an experience directly known and verified. Otherwise, none can be said to have such knowledge; a rational person, for example, can know it neither by mere definition (hudud<\/em>) nor by establishing conceptual proof.<\/p>\n The fact that this knowledge is a direct, experiential knowledge closes its possibility to be known in its real sense merely through verbal transmission or report, however extended the verbal discourses may be. In fact, an extensive explanation on this knowledge would only distort it. It is simply not possible for its taster to cause its non-taster to obtain it.<\/p>\n However, if at all there is any need to express it in a verbal manner (ta\u2018bir<\/em>)\u2014such as the need to instruct other person in this kind of knowledge\u2014it would be sufficient to talk about it by employing allusion that points to what the knower has really \u2018savoured\u2019 or \u2018felt\u2019.<\/p>\n Error of the knowledge of states among \u2018people of tasting\u2019 (ahl al-dhawq<\/em>) may be illustrated in the case of\u00a0 a person whose organs of taste are overcome by yellow bile, so much so that they found honey bitter-tasting, whereas it is not as such; what actually touches the organs of taste is<\/em> the yellow bile and not the honey.<\/p>\n The third level of knowledge is \u2018ilm al-asrar<\/em>, which means knowledge of the secrets of things that are bestowed by Allah to true prophets and saints.<\/p>\n As such, Ibn al-\u2018Arabi points out that this is the knowledge that transcends the limit of knowledge attained by discursive thinking. This level of knowledge has been referred to by the Prophet Muhammad as the knowledge of \u201cthe inbreathing of the Holy Spirit [i.e., the Archangel Gabriel] in the heart\u201d, a tradition cited by Dutch scholar Arent Jan Wensinck in his Concordance et indices de la tradition musulmane<\/em>.<\/p>\n This writer can\u2019t stress it enough: knowledge of the secrets is peculiar and privy to true prophets (sing. nabi<\/em>) and genuine saints (sing. wali<\/em>) only, which can\u2019t be elaborated here due to limited space.<\/p>\n Three examples of knowledge of the secrets are the Prophet\u2019s metaphysical statement that \u201cAllah was, and nothing was with Him\u201d; the Prophet\u2019s saying with regard to the Day of Resurrection that \u201cthere is a pool in it sweeter than honey\u201d; and God\u2019s information to the Prophet on the actual existence of the Garden of Paradise and what is in it.<\/p>\n The ones who know \u2018the knowledge of secrets\u2019, the prophets and saints, are<\/em> the wise people, who know all knowledge and comprehend all of them\u2014such as the divine, natural, mathematical and logical sciences. \u201cHence,\u201d states Ibn al-\u2018Arabi, \u201cthere is no knowledge nobler than this \u2018all-encompassing knowledge\u2019, which comprises the entirety of knowable things (al-hawi \u2018ala jami\u2018 al-ma\u2018lumat<\/em>).\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Blaise Pascal (d. 1662) was a French mathematician, scientist and inventor. As a mathematician, he wrote on the subject of projective geometry, probability theory, and differential calculus. As a scientist, he made significant …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_analytify_skip_tracking":false,"_wpzoom_pinterest_image_url":"","_wpzoom_pinterest_hidden_image":"0","_wpzoom_pinterest_description":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[220],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-20258","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-the-star","category-220","description-off"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ikim.gov.my\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20258","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ikim.gov.my\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ikim.gov.my\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ikim.gov.my\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ikim.gov.my\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=20258"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.ikim.gov.my\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20258\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ikim.gov.my\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=20258"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ikim.gov.my\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=20258"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ikim.gov.my\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=20258"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}